Avatar of John Lash

About John Lash

John writes for the Juvenile Justice Information Exchange. He is also the Program Director at the Georgia Conflict Center, and a Master student in Conflict Management at Kennesaw State University.

‘Home’ Is With My Family

Susan Du | Dec 11 | ImmigrantsJustice

Immigration-rights activists protesting for the release of the 34 Chicago Pallet workers outside the Chicago ICE offices. Photo courtesy of Our Lady of Guadalupe Mission

Immigration-rights activists protesting for the release of the 34 Chicago Pallet workers outside the Chicago ICE offices. Photo courtesy of Our Lady of Guadalupe Mission

Less than a month after Barack Obama was reelected by an increasingly diverse America, immigrants in Chicago and across the United States are discovering that there will be no immediate reprieve from Homeland Security raids in the president’s second term.

As droves of undocumented laborers are arrested in a couple of Chicago’s first post-election raids, the Latinos in Chicago are at once outraged and fearful for the future of their families, community leaders said.

Two weeks ago, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents entered Chicago Pallet Company in Elk Grove Village and arrested 34 on immigration violations. The arrested men, some speaking no English, were all detained before most were released to family on bond following immediate grassroots protests held in response to the arrests.

For now, as these 34 await court dates on charges of violating immigration law, they have avoided direct deportation – something that is becoming more the norm under the Obama administration, according to local and national ICE statistics. In 2011, Chicago ICE deported 11,891 immigrants, a 14 percent increase from 2010 and 20 percent from 2009. Since Obama entered office Homeland Security removed 359,795 to 393,457 immigrants annually, more than that overseen by any other president in history.

As of Friday, all 34 Chicago Pallet workers have been released, some with the help of U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez.

Still, damage was done: Posting bond meant many families had to scrounge up anywhere from $2,000 to $10,000 to win their release. Some faced a steeper bond, having had prior deportation records, with immigrant families raising over $70,000 in total. All now face unemployment. Lives were put on hold, uncertainty pervading everything from their futures in the United States to the source of their next meals.

And because several arrested workers are fathers of U.S.-born children, the threat of deportation also raises the real possibility of family separation.

For up to a week after the raid, the Rev. Jose Landaverde of the Catholic Our Lady of Guadalupe Mission, located a few blocks west of the Cook County courthouse and jail, rallied church members to protest outside the Chicago ICE offices on behalf of the workers.

“Right now we are very upset with the administration of President Obama because he is deporting people, dividing people and taking away the families of United States citizens,” Landaverde said soon after the raid. “The effects are very painful. I don’t know how these politicians are going to deal with the psychological impact they are dealing to our Latino community.”

The arrests at Chicago Pallet were the result of an investigation into the business’ employment practices, wrote ICE spokeswoman Gail Montenegro in an email to The Chicago Bureau.

“(Homeland Security’s) comprehensive worksite enforcement strategy reflects a renewed focus targeting criminal aliens and employers who cultivate illegal workplaces by breaking the country’s laws and knowingly hiring illegal workers,” she said.

In her statement, Montenegro added that ICE must address employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers as a matter of protecting jobs for the lawful workforce. In response to immigrant rights activists’ contention that if they had not protested outside Chicago ICE, the 34 workers would have been deported outright, Montenegro said ICE has no set policy on posting bond.

“[ICE] may opt to exercise prosecutorial discretion in certain cases,” she said. “However, the agency may also choose to pursue enforcement action against individuals and set appropriate bonds, as our resources permit.  ICE determines these actions on a case-by-case basis.”

Despite some advances for undocumented immigrants under Obama, the administration has not backed from deporting illegals. Photo courtesy of ICE.

Despite some advances for undocumented immigrants under Obama, the administration has not backed from deporting illegals. Photo courtesy of ICE.

The unique stress that comes with the imminent danger of family separation can be a roadblock to healthy development for many U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. Magali Renteria, a volunteer immigrant rights activist, said the daily uncertainty suffered by these children puts them at higher risk of performing poorly in school and even making decisions that could set them afoul of the law.

“I know a lot of them go down the wrong road,” she said. “I see a lot of kids where their parents don’t tell them what’s wrong, what’s the issue, because they don’t want to worry them. You have to tell them what’s going on, and that doesn’t always happen. I see a lot of gangbangers and their parents are undocumented. They grow up with this mentality of ‘I don’t care.’”

Renteria, 20, protested outside the Chicago ICE offices every day for a week following the Nov. 29 raid. She is a citizen. But still, she feels compelled – even responsible – to care for the welfare of the greater Latino community, including the undocumented.

“I see a lot of people who become citizens of this country and they just forget about the other people,” Renteria said. “They go, ‘Well, you can just close the borders now because I’m here.’ I also see people like my mother, my father, people from this church, people from the protest who feel like even though they’re citizens that they should give something back.”

Families of undocumented immigrants detained by ICE have limited options going forward in their dealings with Homeland Security. Often navigating the process for the first time can be confusing, and the emotional trauma of not knowing where a loved one is during the initial hours after an arrest is made can exacerbate a sense of crisis, according to immigrant advocates.

Our Lady of Guadalupe Mission is one community organization that provides assistance for families engaged with ICE; the International Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights is another. ICIRR, based in Chicago, operates a deportation crisis hotline, which with its family support network attempts to give immediate and ongoing support for immigrants.

Carrie Fox, ICIRR family support organizer, said families facing deportation often find that other issues – financial and psychological– can come up. As was the case here, arrested immigrants often face the pressures of providing for families without a job.

To counter this, ICIRR refers people to social service agencies – many themselves suffering under the strain of a budget crisis and poor economy – to alleviate meeting basic needs. They also seek out religious leaders of a host of faiths and attorneys versed in immigration law.

In the case of mixed families – including some citizens and some undocumented residents, Fox said ICIRR advises parents to create some kind of contingency plan for the care of their children in the case that, despite many and sometimes pricey efforts, they are still deported.

“It’s not something that people like to think about,” she said. “It’s not a pleasant idea – it’s a very scary and nerve-wracking idea, being separated from your children, but [alternate plans] is something that we always encourage.”

If parents are designated for deportation, families face the difficult choice of whether to leave their children in America or return to their countries of origin with them. Fox said in her experience, generally U.S.-born children will stay in the country when their parents are deported.

“It’s where they’ve been raised and where they go to school, and where the families know they’ll have opportunities for their future,” Fox said. “We hear from a lot of families that that’s why they’re here, to provide a better future for their children. But that of course creates the issue of family separation that is so tough.”

Yet at least one Mexican family affected by the raid on Chicago Pallet would rather stick together than hold out for what opportunities American citizenship may provide.

Silvia Munoc, the 19-year-old daughter of Efarin Munoc, one of the men arrested in late November, said even though she moved to the U.S. at the age of five, she is prepared to return to Mexico with her parents and younger U.S.-born siblings because “home” is where her family is.

Munoc said her family now faces basic challenges of maintaining the house and providing meals. Nevertheless, nine months pregnant with a baby girl due Dec. 31, Munoc is looking forward. She said her father’s struggles has taught her to work hard, and she predicts that being bilingual in Mexico will open up competitive job opportunities for her and her siblings.

“All I care about is my family and I being together,” she said. “I don’t care about anything else. We all have to face fears, and we all have to work and struggle. Not everything is going to be easy.”

Deferred Action: Joy, Fear and Frustration

Maria Sanchez, a 17-year-old high school senior who received deferred action in October. Photo by Oliver Ortega

Maria Sanchez, a 17-year-old high school senior who received deferred action in October. Photo by Oliver Ortega

The plastic cards that changed Maria Sanchez’s life came inconspicuously in the mail one after the other. Each one was like a key to a future in which she could work, drive and go to college without the fear of deportation.

“It was just a huge relief,” Maria said. ”It was like I could breathe.”
By mid-October, the 17-year-old had already received her work permit, I.D., driver’s license and social security card— all the legal documents available to youth like her in Illinois under the federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy.
But even before the application process opened, Maria changed. After President Barack Obama first announced the policy in June, she came out of the shadows and began volunteering with the West Suburban Action Project [Proyecto de Accion de Los Suburbios del Oeste], a faith-based coalition and the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR), helping with activities ranging from voter registration to speaking on panels. Over the summer, she created the only Latino student group at Glenbard West High School, where she is a senior.
She met others like her – undocumented youth-turned-activists -  waiting to find a relief that seemed closer than ever. When that day finally came on August 15, she chose to volunteer at Navy Pier to help others apply for deferred action, and sent in her own application a few days later.
Maria would drive from her home in Glendale Heights, a town 30 miles west of Chicago, to volunteer in the city. Her parents would worry and sometimes only let her go after considerable pleading. Police cars were a scary sight. She didn’t want to think about could happen if she got pulled over. But now with her license, Maria drives all the time.
Buoyed by Obama’s promise of deferred action, she came out about her status to friends and acquaintances who were so surprised they thought she was joking, and was surprised herself when she learned of other undocumented students at her school.
“I started figuring out that it wasn’t just me,” Maria said. “People from my school that you wouldn’t have thought are undocumented are. Even for me, they were like ‘what, you can’t be undocumented; you’ve been here all your life’.”
A dream incomplete
I first met Maria and her parents at a rally for immigration reform outside of the Obama election night party in Chicago. She was a speaker at a “Keeping Our Families Together” event. It was organized by ICIRR, and similar rallies were held in 16 cities across the country, including outside of Mitt Romney’s Presidential election night party in Boston.
Organizers told me that while members of the immigrant community were happy with the deferred action initiative, parents were still getting deported and needed the relief their children had been offered. As those gathered waited under a cold drizzle to find out who would become president, Maria spoke about receiving deferred action and urged the crowd of about 100 people to continue pushing for comprehensive immigration reform.
It struck me that unlike most of the other participants her age, Maria had come with her parents. They marched alongside her from Chinatown to the McCormick Place convention center, and watched as she spoke to the huddled group in front of many cameras and lights.
I told her I wanted to write a story on the challenges families like hers faced after a member received deferred action, and she agreed to let me interview her and her parents in their home. [Click here for an explanation of what a mixed-status family is.]
Maria and her mother Consuelo. “Two universities have already accepted her, and I tell her ‘look, now you will have to choose’,” Consuelo said with a laugh. Photo by Oliver Ortega.

Maria and her mother Consuelo. “Two universities have already accepted her, and I tell her ‘look, now you will have to choose’,” Consuelo said with a laugh. Photo by Oliver Ortega.

 

Despite their joy at Maria’s new prospects, her parents and siblings are still undocumented and waiting for relief. Her parents have been in the U.S. for almost twenty years, about half of which they’ve spent here illegally since their tourist visa expired almost a decade ago.
Sitting with them in their kitchen, I interviewed Maria in English and her parents in Spanish, which probably put them more at ease with speaking to a reporter for the first time.
Maria’s mother, Consuelo, agreed to let me use her name and photo because her employer and co-workers already know she is undocumented, so she doesn’t fear being fired or referred to immigration enforcement by people from work. She has worked for almost 20 years at a large electronics manufacturer’s local warehouse in a low-paying position she didn’t want to specify. Consuelo has had to pass up promotions that required proof she was in the country legally, which led others at her job to assume she was undocumented, she said.
Maria’s father is a cargo driver for a large clothing store chain. Initially, Mr. Sanchez had agreed to be photographed and named for this story along with his wife. I had told the three of them it would be published on Immigrant Connect’s website and possibly in other publications, and he had seemed eager to talk about his experiences.
But a few days later, Mr. Sanchez had a change of heart, and asked me not to publish his name and photo for fear of losing his job and facing deportation.
In their time in the U.S., Maria’s parents have never had any problems with law enforcement, and they don’t know anyone who’s been deported. This tenuous stability, along with their daughter’s new relief and activism, emboldened them to let me tell their family’s story.
“It was very important she take advantage of [deferred action],” Mr. Sanchez said. “If I feel scared, I cut off that [feeling].”
Maria was born in the Mexican state of Guanajuato. Her parents brought her to the U.S. when she was about a month old, a decision her mother, Consuelo, often laments, as she would have liked her daughter to be a U.S. citizen by birthright.
Maria’s parents owned a wholesale clothing business and lived comfortably  in Guanajuato, but people they had sold to on credit failed to pay them back and they had to close. It was then they decided to try their luck in the U.S.
They immigrated with Maria’s sister on a tourist visa a few years before Maria was born, but Consuelo decided to go back to Mexico to give birth to her because she was afraid of complications that could arise due to her age (she was 40).
All three of Maria’s siblings are too old to qualify for deferred action. Instead, five of her nieces and nephews have applied, and three have already obtained deferred action status.
Consuelo and her husband are delighted that Maria, a straight-A student with a long list of extracurricular activities and awards, plans to go to college next year and possibly pursue a career in law.
Her list of universities has expanded since receiving deferred action, and she hopes to work soon to help her parents offset the costs of college. She also plans to apply for an Illinois DREAM Fund scholarship, which became available for the first time in October.
“Two universities have already accepted her, and I tell her ‘look, now you will have to choose’,” Consuelo said with a laugh.
Despite years without legal trouble and the great joy Maria’s relief has brought them, the Sanchez family is haunted by the possibility of being broken up.
“We’re scared … to know that my parents are in a situation where they aren’t protected. I don’t know what I’d do [if they were deported],” Maria said.
Her parents fear that at any moment immigration agents could come knocking on their door or pay them a visit at work. And that their older children, who all have families, could be deported.
“You never know when immigration agents will come to your workplace,” Mr. Sanchez said. “And they take you and grab you. It’s a very ugly feeling to have.”
By their own account, Maria’s parents have been working and paying taxes since they first moved to Illinois from Mexico.
“I think we’ve contributed a lot to this country,” Consuelo said. “[My family] is healthy, studious, and I think we have the right to be here legally.”
Going forward
Many Latino leaders and immigrant groups have taken note that while some immigrant youth like Maria have found relief under the Obama administration, their parents have not, and have made curbing deportations an important part of their agenda during the president’s second term in office.
“The separation of families has been the main thing that has been devastating our community” said Alaa Mukahhal, one of the election night rally’s main organizers. “When the father or mother is deported and the family is left behind, sometimes children are left with no one to support them … We need to see reform and we need to see it quickly and we need to keep our families together.”
Obama has come under fire for the record number of deportations – about 400,000 a year – that have occurred during his presidency. He tried to lower deportations last year with a prosecutorial discretion initiative that was supposed to halt the removal of some low-priority immigrants, especially breadwinners in mixed-status families. But the measure had little effect, as fewer than two percent of cases reviewed were closed as of late May, according to statistics provided by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In the first six months of 2011, almost 47,000 immigrants deported by the agency claimed to be the parent of at least one U.S. citizen child, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This number is a record high.
Initially, Maria was scared that applying for deferred action could jeopardize her family. Chicago-based immigration lawyer Susan Fortino said many applicants feared – especially before the elections, when it looked like Romney could win – that the information they provided could be used to arrest and deport them and their undocumented relatives.
Maria has received an I.D., driver’s license, work permit and social security. (Photo credit: Oliver Ortega)

Maria has received an I.D., driver’s license, work permit and social security. (Photo credit: Oliver Ortega)

But Fortino, an immigration lawyer of 25 years who has worked on about 50 DACA cases, said she tries to assure her clients the government will not do that.
“The government will not be using any information on these applications to bring action against these kids … and with family members, we’ve sort of been assured they won’t pursue them,” she said.
Although some parents are also scared of their children giving personal information, most “are overjoyed that their children will be able to attend school, obtain employment authorization, [and] obtain a driver’s license with legal status, albeit temporary”, Fortino said.
Indeed, Maria’s relief and the prospect of her becoming a citizen have her parents elated and willing to take the risks of giving sensitive information. Despite Mr. Sanchez’s misgivings about being featured in this article, he said he and his wife have supported their daughter in her efforts to get her story out, such as when they accompanied her to speak at the election night rally.
On the campaign trail, both President Obama and Mitt Romney pledged to address immigration reform in their first year in office. Some pegged the DACA policy as a late attempt by the president to win over Hispanic and immigrant voters disenchanted by his poor performance on deportations and the failure to pass a federal DREAM Act.
The impetus for new immigration reform picked up in the wake of the election, with many Republicans calling on their party to ease its hardline stance on immigration in order to win over more Hispanic and immigrant voters. A few weeks after the election, two Republican senators introduced a bill called the Achieve Act that would grant permanent residency, but not provide a pathway for citizenship, to childhood arrivals if they pursue a college education or military service.
“There’s a lot of momentum around immigration reform since the day after the election,” said Laura Vazquez, a policy expert for theNational Council of La Raza, the largest Latino civil rights group in the nation.
“We’re seeing a lot of movement on the hill … We’re in a totally different place.”
Vazquez said she expects that reform affecting most of the nearly 12 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. will be passed during Obama’s second term, and criticizes the Achieve Act and other recent bills proposed by Republicans for being limited in scope and piecemeal.
Like many immigrant families, the Sanchezes were pulling hard for President Obama to win the election. Consuelo laughed when her husband mentioned Romney’s strategy of having illegal immigrants self-deport.
Mr. Sanchez said he has full confidence that President Obama will not renege on his deferred action policy.
With her new license, Maria drives everywhere.
“Initially I wasn’t scared because this was a great opportunity for Maria,” he said. “If Obama gave it, it would be fine, I thought. But I was a little worried when it looked like Romney could become president.”
With her new license, Maria drives everywhere.(Photo credit: Oliver Ortega)

With her new license, Maria drives everywhere.(Photo credit: Oliver Ortega)

Despite hoping to return to Mexico one day, Maria’s parents believe their daughter –especially after receiving deferred action– will have more opportunities in the U.S., and so they are committed to staying for now. The family used to often go back to Guanajuato when they had their tourist visa, but stopped once it expired.
In order to travel outside the country, youth with deferred action must apply for permission and show a compelling need to travel outside the country, as well as pay a $360 fee, according to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Services website. The procedure is still being finalized.
Maria and her parents, as well as many experts, are confident DACA recipients will be provided a pathway to citizenship in the future. But the Sanchez family is still waiting for the comprehensive immigration reform that will provide them with the stability they deserve.
“Becoming documented is like waking up,” Mr. Sanchez said. “It’s a great joy and hopefully it’ll be for all of us, right?”
Originally published December 9, 2012 on ImmigrantConnect.org.

International Group Hails Florida Juvenile Justice Reformer

Written by: Maggie Lee on Nov 28, 2012

Wansley Walters. Photo courtesy of the International Juvenile Justice Observatory.

The woman driving the Florida Juvenile Justice Department toward a goal of “system excellence” is a 2012 winner of an international award that recognizes commitment to children’s justice.

“We’re trying to do a complete paradigm shift,” said Wansley Walters, Secretary of the Florida DJJ and one of eight recipients of the 2012 Juvenile Justice Without Borders International Award, presented by the International Juvenile Justice Observatory, a Belgium-based international organization that works in conjunction with the United Nations, the European Union and other groups.

“We’re trying to be proactive, not reactive,” she said.

Walters came to the DJJ nearly two years ago from the Miami-Dade County Juvenile Services Department. There she pushed to keep most kids in treatment or diversion programs, leaving secure beds and police records only for the most serious, risky offenders.

That program attracted observers from as far away as Thailand, who used some of Miami’s principles in their own national juvenile justice reforms. Indeed, Thailand’s national agency in charge of juvenile justice won an IJJO award as well.

Other winners of the biennial prize include activists and researchers based in Europe and Africa. An honorary award was given to Georges Loinger, a Jewish teacher during World War II who escaped from Nazi captivity and smuggled hundreds of Jewish youngsters into safety in Switzerland.

They received the awards at the 2012 International Youth Justice Convention in London earlier this month. Afterward, Walters returned to the road in Florida, promoting, publicizing and explaining the department’s “Roadmap to System Excellence,” a just-published set of policies and programs aimed at making the state a national model for juvenile justice.

“When you have a child who’s committed a minor offense, that does not mean that he’s a minor offender,” said Walters on Nov. 27, ahead of a Gainesville, Fla., town hall meeting about the map. “Nor does it mean that he does not have some significant risk factors.”

So when a child commits some offense, it is key, she said, to screen and assess that child as early in the process as possible and send him to the right follow-up.

“You may have three shoplifters, [who] have three entirely different scenarios behind them,” she gave as an example. One may have made a stupid mistake and does not need a lot of resources to keep him out of trouble. Another might be a substance abuser who will straighten up with treatment. The third could be acting out due to abuse at home and needs a completely different set of services.

Figuring out those scenarios early gives law enforcement a chance to use their resources strategically, she explained.

That philosophy matches with London conference presentations. “Research on adolescent brain development has led to a widespread acknowledgement that youth are different from adults, and so should be given treatment rather than punishment – again, particularly in the case of low-level juvenile offenders,” Elizabeth Clarke, president of the Juvenile Justice Initiative in Illinois, told the crowd in London.

Walters also said she finds that juvenile justice “is a very socieo-economic system. The kind of system you experience depends on the family you come from.”

Some children have many supportive adults who can offer them shelter, or who have money, or who can give them a ride to court. Others get sent to juvenile hall because they are charged with misdemeanor domestic violence and have no other relative to stay with, or get a contempt citation just because there’s no way to get to the courthouse.

Programs starting up now aim to fill those gaps by making rides available and setting up “cooling-off” shelters with family intervention services for children accused solely of misdemeanor domestic abuse.

By 2014, Walters plans to present the state Legislature with a package of legal changes that will help pave the road to system excellence.

“We’ve been using detention as a catchall. It’s expensive and it’s damaging and it should only be used for a child that represents a threat to public safety,” she said.

The IJJO Conference and International Youth Justice Convention was held to “provide valuable and practical international perspectives on developments in juvenile justice,” said organizing committee Chair Malcolm Stevens in a written statement.

Obama’s win and Immigration

Two Stories from the World Bureau

 

Promise – And Some Doubt – For Immigrants With Obama Win »

Supporters of Obama celebrate at his securing of 270 electoral votes. Obama’s win was due in part to significant support from Hispanic and other immigrant voters, who advocates hope will speed talks on immigration reform. Photo by Joyce Lee/The Chicago Bureau

A week ago this evening, President Barack Obama scored another four years in the White House – ending a close and sometimes nasty campaign that turned, in parts of the nation, to a significant degree on the immigrant vote.

But for many immigrant experts, advocacy groups, and undocumented immigrants, trying to navigate a complicated system, the Obama win was not so much the cap to a long battle – but rather the starting point on a new and wide push to enmesh the immigrant presence and their ample political weight into the political discourse.

This is especially the hope of those backing sharp changes to the United States’ deportation policies. Consider that in Illinois alone, where the deportation debate is quite vocal, the undocumented population makes up an estimated 31 percent of the state’s immigrants, according to a recent study by the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies.

And nationally, Hispanic voters now account for 10 percent of the electorate, with a strong majority – 71 percent – having voted for Obama, according to a report by the Pew Hispanic Center.

In key states, such as Florida, much turned on the immigrant vote, and while it would be unfair to say that immigrants are a wholesale voting bloc for the Democrats, their sway in that state in Obama’s favor was big in possibly pushing up deportation on the to-do list of this administration according to the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights.

Here in Chicago, which Obama calls home and where the victory celebration was held, immigrant backers claim the city is among the most immigrant-friendly in the world – and, through policy, outreach and inclusion, should be emulated elsewhere in the nation so that such a large and influential community can be heard.

Adolfo Hernandez, director of Mayor Rahm Emmanuel’s Office of New Americans, said the current policy landscape deals mostly in naturalizing immigrants because of the belief immigrants help bump up income levels, number of women in the work force, and voter participation.

“We’re doing this because it’s within our values, the values of the city,” Hernandez said. “It’s also within our need to thrive as a global city.”

In June, Emmanuel announced the “Chicago New Americans Initiative,” a comprehensive plan designed to assist 10,000 immigrants to become naturalized citizens over a three-year period. According to Hernandez, 350,000 immigrants are eligible to become citizens in Illinois, and more than half are located in Chicago.

According to a press release from Emanuel’s office in June, naturalized immigrants have 14.6 percent higher incomes and 9.9 percent lower poverty rates than their counterparts.

So Chicago’s plan is meant to help the city’s economy grow by propping up a wealthier workforce,. Measures include encouraging immigrants to apply for citizenship, hosting citizenship workshops, and offering free assistance to those applying for citizenship. These, and more, actions are aimed at making the process less daunting, as many immigrants chose not to apply because of the complexity of the application.

The plan carries on the efforts of previous collaboration between Illinois and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office to naturalize immigrants, which has reached 58,160 immigrants in the last 7 years, according to Lawrence Benito, ICIRR’s executive director and CEO.

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill), the DREAM Act’s chief advocate in Congress, speaks with reporters at McCormick Place on election night. Undocumented youth have latched their hopes to the DREAM Act and Obama offered temporary reprieve when he signed an executive order to defer deportation for youth eligible for the DREAM Act. Photo by Joyce Lee/The Chicago Bureau

“We’re not just doing this out of the kindness of our hearts,” Hernandez said. “We’re doing this because it benefits us, the city.”

But such friendly attitudes face paramount challenges when it comes to national reform. Though Obama has been lauded for his immigrant-centric policies, namely the DREAM Act, and received wide support for his promises to provide illegal immigrants a path to citizenship, 396,906 undocumented immigrants were deported in 2011, according to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.

This grievance was brought to light in the vigil for separated families held by the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) outside of Chicago’s McCormick Place on election night. Many attendees saw the immigrant vote and policies towards undocumented immigrants as inextricably tied.

In discussions, the economic value of immigrants shouldn’t be the center of conversation, said Joshua Hoyt, the Chief Strategy Executive of ICIRR. “In Illinois in the last 6 years, there are 561,193 children who have lost a parent to deportation,” Hoyt said. “For us, the moral imperative is to march to keep families [together].”

“This is a celebration of the immigrant vote, as well as its direct connection to the deportations,” said Alaa Mukahhal, an undocumented Palestinian-American, before the results. “We’re hoping that we can get attention that the immigrant vote really is a deciding factor… What immigrants want right now is to stop these deportations.”

But advocates are pushing for more than the recognition of the immigrant vote. Many are still counting on Obama’s promise to provide illegal immigrants a path to citizenship and to create more humane conditions in detention centers.

The UN Special Rapporteur recently accused a detention center in Texas of torture, and a 39-year old immigrant died in a detention center in Georgia after nursing staff neglected the man’s heart infections, according to a statement Tuesday from the Detention Watch Network. The country is in critical need of immediate immigrant reform, and Obama’s unfulfilled promises weigh heavily on his renewed presidency, Mukahhal said.

And as hoped for, the election seems to have spurred bipartisan cooperation on immigration reform. Reports out Tuesday said that U.S. Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) have been working together on a bill to ease the immigration process. ICIRR also aims to create opportunities for immigrants and nonimmigrants to work together to foster mutual understanding.

Many immigrants support Obama because he has publicly supported giving citizenship to immigrants, Hoyt said. But for the undocumented, the immediate issue is deferred action, a temporary relief that many hope will be granted to more than just the undocumented youth.

“Nobody’s giving us 100 percent [certainty] that we will not be deported,” said Tatianna, an undocumented immigrant going through the deportation process. “But we have hope.”

 

Immigrants Want Quick Action on Lofty Reform Promises From Obama’s First Term »

Despite a new policy granting some undocumented youth the chance to live and work in the United States, the prevalence of family separation due to deportation has caused much concern in the immigrant community.

Last week, about 100 people rallied for immigration reform outside of President Barack Obama’s election night viewing party in Chicago.

The Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights organized the event, called “Keeping Our Families Together,” and similar rallies were held across the country, including outside the Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s viewing party in Boston.

While the nation watched as returns poured in showing Obama the victor, people here and around the nation clamored and created a chorus that they would not stand for inaction on the seemingly bold promises made by Obama in his first term.

Rather than simply wait, perhaps for years, for a comprehensive immigration reform bill to get through Congress and signed into law, these voices were calling for any change – however small – immediately to keep the trust of the swelling immigrant community.

 

Obstacles to implementing Restorative Programs

Restorative Justice has steadily gained acceptance and demonstrated its effectiveness around the world, yet challenges remain. Often they are not directly related to the process itself, but instead arise from economic and political considerations.

From the abstract abstract in the Journal of Asian Public Policy, Volume 5, Issue 3, 2012,

Practical considerations in the implementation of further restorative justice programmes for juvenile offenders in Hong Kong.

“Despite some initial interests in and recommendations for further implementing restorative justice (RJ) programmes to deal with juvenile offenders, the Hong Kong Government has rejected such an agenda being moved forward. This article reports on the findings from a small-scale, qualitative study that examined various obstacles hindering the implementation of RJ programmes in Hong Kong. It explores, from the perspectives of 12 professional practitioners who have experience dealing with juvenile offenders or who have been a part of the Hong Kong justice system, the desirability and feasibility of introducing RJ as an alternative form of dispute resolution for juvenile offenders. The views and ideas of these practitioners provide insights into the practical difficulties of establishing RJ in Hong Kong. These difficulties mainly involve a lack of resources and expertise for setting up RJ components within the existing criminal justice system.”

In this instance the opposition is not to the process itself, but instead to insufficient personnel with experience and money to implement the programs.

From the Brisbane Times in Queensland, Australia, “More than half of the full-time staff have been cut from a juvenile offenders justice program with a success rate of 98 per cent. But the cuts have been defended by the Newman government as being in the interest of victims. Sixty-five full-time equivalent positions will be cut from a pool of 119.65 in the coming months as the cost of stopping courts referring juvenile offenders to the Youth Justice Conferencing Program. The program brings offenders together with their victims and family members for mediation through a police officer and has garnered praise for its effectiveness. Official figures from the Children’s Court of Queensland show 95 per cent of participants reach an agreement in the conference, 98 per cent of participants being satisfied with the resolution reached and 97 per cent would tell a friend to undergo a similar process.”

In Queensland, with a conservative leaning government, the opposition is couched in terms of providing more funds for victims’ rights, despite the high satisfaction rate of participating victims. Referrals from the court make up over half of the cases handled in the program, and without them the impact will be greatly decreased. As one commenter noted, the action is short sighted and ignores the savings inherent in a restorative approach.

Lastly, consider the approach of the Ministry of Justice in the United Kingdom. As outlined by the Restorative Justice Council, “[a] recent Joint Justice Inspectorates report found that restorative justice in the UK is limited by ’patchy’ availability across the country, gaps in access across the stages of the justice system and inconsistent quality of restorative justice being delivered. This action plan aims to tackle these limitations.”

The action plan will be coupled with pending legislation permitting pre – sentencing meetings between victims and offenders. In this instance, advocates for restorative justice have included victims’ rights groups, placing their needs foremost. Also, the U.K. program uses evidence based practices that have been shown to be more effective than traditional punitive approaches.

It seems that the U. K. has found a way to implement effective programs that address the needs of all involved, surmounts logistical obstacles, and supersedes the scoring of political points for short term gain.

North Korea: A rare look

By Joyce Lee; Edited by Ava Wallace

The World Bureau brings together Youth Policy’s Youth and Justice page with The Chicago Bureaua collaboration of professional journalists, university faculty and students who report news vitally connected to international youth issues. Here they bring us a rare glance into North Korea, the oft maligned “hermit kingdom” about which so little is known. Through the stories of young people we are invited to consider the complexities of the nation, and offered an unusual glance at Western society

I first meet Yeon Hwa Kim, 27, and Hyo Seong Choi, 23, in front of the blood sausage stand where they work at the local Korean supermarket in Northern Virginia.

I’m stumbling over my Korean and glancing at my mother, hoping she’ll translate what I’m trying to say.  The two look at me without much expression, almost confused, while I tell them I’m a college journalism student who wants to discuss their escape from North Korea and talk about refugee life in America.

Kim’s face melts into a smile and she agrees to do the interview.  She says she gets how tough college is and then asks, “But why’d you chose such a difficult topic?”

Kim, a petite figure with a pale face made even more so by the contrast of her straight black hair, meets me in a café the next day.  Her makeup is precise with crisp lines drawn just above her eyes, and she’s dressed in a loose, baby blue T-shirt and skinny jeans.

My mother is with us again, and she offers to pay for the iced coffee that Kim has just ordered.  They argue, kiddingly, but given the tradition in Korea that the older generation typically picks up the tab, my mother ends up paying.

Still, the brief protest is a show of manners learned back home and carried over in a society that sometimes pays no mind to them. Choi hangs back, watching with a wide grin.  He has a square face and messy hair, dons a white T-shirt and brown cargo pants and looks like he just woke up.

The stories begin.

Kim left North Korea at 15 when, she says, “life just seemed so hopeless,” and both describe a stretch from the early 1990s to the early 2000s when at least a million North Koreans starved to death.  The deaths reached their peak during a two-year period from late 1996 to 1998.  And North Korea’s chronic food shortage is far from over.  According to the United Nations,North Korea’s grain production will drop 13 percent this year due to heavy rain and flooding.

But before the 1990s, Choi and Kim say there was plenty of food to go around and they were told the government threw away extra meat.

This surprises us – my mother, especially, because she was born in the early 1960s, a little less than a decade after the Korean War; she had always been told North Koreans were starving under Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il’s predecessor.

So any association of North Koreans with a high quality of life amazes my mother and me. Kim and Choi laugh at the look on my face. Is this the first I heard of it, they ask?  I suddenly felt naïve as I nod ‘yes’ in response.

One morning when she was 15 years old, Kim says she woke up and her mother wouldn’t let her leave the house.  For years, Kim would wake up only to hear of the death of another neighbor; her grandfather and aunt starved to death.  But on this morning, her mother made sure Kim stayed inside until four bodies, the family of Kim’s friend from elementary school, had been cleared from their living room.

Read more here

Microsoft Launches New Initiative to Fight Global Youth Unemployment

by James Swift

 

Last week, Microsoft announced a new global initiative called YouthSpark, which seeks to improve conditions for more than 300 million young people in more than 100 countries over the next three years.

As part of the new initiative, Microsoft will be launching the YouthSpark Hub, a comprehensive, online access point for youth services, resources and programs that are provided by the nonprofit partners of the initiative. Additionally, Microsoft announced that it would be launching a new, micro-giving marketplace – Give for Youth – which allows users to donate to global youth causes, as well as a new online service called Microsoft Innovate for Good, which seeks to connect youth so that may use technological resources to improve conditions in their communities.

Global partners for the initiative include GlobalGiving Foundation, TakingITGlobal, Silatech and the Trust for Americas. Recently, Microsoft also announced that it would be supporting five new nonprofits in the United States; the Boys & Girls Club of America, City Year, Junior Achievement USA, the Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship and Year Up.

According the International Youth Foundation, approximately 75 million young people across the globe were unemployed last year, while the latest statistics from the International Labor Organization predict youth unemployment will swell to 12.9 percent over then next five years.

At a conference launching YouthSpark, Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Balmer said the new initiative is designed to help youth across the globe though education, employment and entrepreneurship.

“We believe that working with our partners, we can help empower young people to change their world, and we are committed to using our technology, talent, time and resources to do that.

Originally posted in Youth Today

 

Boston College Junior Named First U.S. Youth Rep. to U.N.

 by Kaukab Jhumra Smith

 

There’s a fresh new face among the United States delegates gathered at the General Assembly of the United Nations this week.

Twenty-year-old Brooke Loughrin, a well-traveled Seattle-area native who speaks several languages and attends Boston College in Massachusetts, has become the first youth representative sent by the United States to the United Nations headquarters in New York.

Brooke LoughrinThe U.S. State Department identified Loughrin as the country’s first “youth observer” to the U.N. on Friday. The announcement came about a week later than originally anticipated, because the department was “focused on navigating the diplomatic challenges of the recent events that occurred overseas,” explained Joe Catapano, a spokesperson for the nonprofit United Nations Association for the United States of America, which helped the State Department with the selection process.

Unlike 40 or so other countries, the United States has never sent a youth delegate to the United Nations. The new youth observer position falls short of a full delegate role but has been described by State Department and UNA-USA spokespersons as a first step toward including young people’s voices within the United States mission to the U.N.

In her new role, Loughrin will attend the General Assembly session in New York and other secondary events by nonprofits this week. For the rest of the year, her responsibilities will include reaching out to young people around the country to discuss problems affecting the world’s youth and to increase their awareness of the role the U.N. plays in finding solutions.

Depending on how the fledgling program goes, the youth observer role could turn into a full-fledged youth delegate program over the next year or two, Mark Schlachter of the State Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs told Youth Today.

As it stands now, the unpaid observer role lasts one year and can be filled only by a U.S. citizen between the ages of 18 and 25. The position was first announced on Aug. 23 and allowed a scant two-week window for applications.

Selected from 730 applicants from around the United States and its territories, Loughrin flew to New York Friday evening, and by Saturday, was attending briefings by the State Department and tweeting regularly from her new @usyouthobserver account. Most of her tweets were observations from the Social Good Summit over the weekend. She did not reply to a tweet requesting a Twitter interview with Youth Today.

An honors student and a double major in political science and Islamic civilizations and societies, Loughrin serves as editor-in-chief of Al-Noor, her college’s academic journal on Middle Eastern and Islamic studies. She speaks at least five languages besides English: French, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish and Persian (Farsi) according to her Facebook profile.

She studied in India for a semester in high school, and wrote a blog on her experiences at the time.

“My experience in India shocked, awed, horrified, and moved me (often in the same day),” she wrote in her final blog entry, dated Dec. 31, 2008. “My goal in life is to make it easier to help people help themselves and others.”

Loughrin also traveled to Iran during high school and spent a college summer studying Persian in Tajikistan under a U.S. State Department scholarship. And according to her LinkedIn profile, she tutored male inmates at Suffolk County House of Corrections in Massachusetts last summer.

Bogdan Covaliu, a doctor who served as a youth delegate to the United Nations from Romania in 2008, thinks the American decision to include a youth voice within its U.N. mission sets a positive example for other countries.

Speaking to Youth Today from Romania via Skype, Covaliu had some advice for the new American youth observer. He counseled patience with what he characterized as the U.N.’s rather slow but steady progress on solving issues. And he pointed out that young people in other countries often face human rights abuses and other problems that the United States settled within itself long ago.

“Try to think of the world and the globalization process as a whole, and not specifically just the problems that U.S. youth face at this point,” Covaliu said.

Originally posted in Youth Today

Photo from the United Nations Association of the United State of America.

Indian laws offer contradictory definitions

By Institute for Global Labour and Human RightsAn August 29 article in the Hindustan Times outlines the difficulties in establishing consistent classification of children and adolescents, as India struggles to implement a dizzying array of laws that deal with children.

Child advocates complain that a recent decision to deal with child labor violations outlined in the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition) Act, through the Juvenile Justice Act will likely muddy the issue, since the two laws do not share a common definition of adolescent.

India ratified the U.N. Convention on Child Rights in 1991, and subsequently amended the Juvenile Justice Act to match the definition of a child as a person under the age of eighteen. Two laws that address employment have contradictory definitions of adolescents.

Government regulations as well contain inconsistent definitions of children and adolescents.

India, a country of over one billion people, has massive numbers of children employed in child labor.

Differing Standards

Child Labour Prohibition – Adolescents are between 14 and 18

Minimum Wages Act – Allows those between 14 and 18 to work

Factories Act – Defines adolescents as between 15 – 18

Juvenile Justice Act – No definition of adolescents. Children are below 18

U.N. Convention on Child Rights – Children are below 18